Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings. AIM: We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres. METHODS: We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres. RESULTS: The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres (P = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Remission Is Maintained after Switch from Dose-Optimised Intravenous Treatment to Subcutaneous Treatment with Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background and Objectives: The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of vedolizumab has proven to be effective for the maintenance of remission after intravenous induction. Little is known about the efficacy of switching from intravenous maintenance treatment to SC. We aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of switching to SC treatment and to assess the impact of a baseline treatment regimen. Materials and Methods: In this observational cohort study, adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were switched to SC vedolizumab maintenance treatment were enrolled. Patients after intravenous induction and patients who switched from intravenous maintenance treatment (every 8 weeks or every 4 weeks) were included. The SC vedolizumab dosing was 108 mg every 2 weeks, regardless of the previous regimen. The clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease activity parameters and vedolizumab serum concentrations at the time of the switch and at the follow-up were assessed. Results: In total, 135 patients (38% Crohn's disease, 62% ulcerative colitis) were switched to SC vedolizumab treatment. The median time to the first follow-up (FU) was 14.5 weeks (IQR 12-26), and the median time to the second FU was 40 weeks (IQR 36-52). Nine patients (7%) discontinued SC vedolizumab treatment, with two-thirds of them discontinuing due to active disease. In all dosing regimens, there were no significant changes in the clinical scores and CRP at the baseline and first and second FUs. Clinical and biochemical remission appeared to be maintained irrespective of the previous dosing regimen. Conclusions: The results of this real-world study suggest that the maintenance of clinical and biomarker remission can be achieved in patients who switched from intravenous to SC vedolizumab. The baseline vedolizumab dosing regimen (every 4 weeks versus every 8 weeks) did not have an impact on outcomes.

Performance of European and American Societies of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Prediction of Choledocholithiasis in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.

Background and Objectives: Up to one-third of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis also present with choledocholithiasis. Guidelines from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) for investigating suspected choledocholithiasis suggest endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with high-likelihood (ESGE)/high-probability (ASGE) predictors and endoscopic ultrasound in those with intermediate-likelihood (ESGE)/intermediate-probability (ASGE) predictors. Although both guidelines are similar, they are not identical. Furthermore, these algorithms were mainly developed from cohorts of patients without pancreatitis and are therefore poorly validated in a subset of patients with acute pancreatitis. We aimed to assess the performance of the ESGE and ASGE algorithms for the prediction of choledocholithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre in the year 2020 due to acute biliary pancreatitis. Results: Choledocholithiasis was confirmed in 29/86 (33.7%) of patients (13 with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and 16 with endoscopic ultrasound). All 10/10 (100%) ESGE high-likelihood and 14/19 (73.7%) ASGE high-probability patients had choledocholithiasis. Only 19/71 (26.8%) patients with ESGE intermediate likelihood and 15/67 (22.4%) with ASGE intermediate probability had choledocholithiasis. Only 8/13 (61.5%) patients with the ASGE high-probability predictor of dilated common bile duct plus bilirubin > 68.4 µmol/mL had choledocholithiasis. Since this predictor is not considered high likelihood by ESGE, this resulted in a superior specificity of the European compared to the American guideline (100% vs. 91.2%). Following the American instead of the European guidelines would have resulted in five unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies and five unnecessary endoscopic ultrasound examinations. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis suggests that the European guidelines may perform better than the American guidelines at predicting choledocholithiasis in the setting of acute pancreatitis. This was because dilated common bile duct plus bilirubin > 68.4 µmol/mL was not a reliable predictor for persistent bile duct stones.

Real-Life Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Various Situations in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Worldwide Multicenter Collaborative Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tofacitinib (TFB) appears to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC); however, available real-world studies are limited by cohort size. TFB could be an option in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of TFB in moderate-to-severe colitis and ASUC. METHODS: This retrospective, international cohort study enrolling UC patients with ≥6-week follow-up period was conducted from February 1 to July 31, 2022. Indications were categorized as ASUC and chronic activity (CA). Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Steroid-free remission (SFR), colectomy, and safety data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 391 UC patients (median age 38 [interquartile range, 28-47] years; follow-up period 26 [interquartile range, 14-52] weeks) were included. A total of 27.1% received TFB in ASUC. SFR rates were 23.7% (ASUC: 26.0%, CA: 22.8%) at week 12 and 41.1% (ASUC: 34.2%, CA: 43.5%) at week 52. The baseline partial Mayo score (odds ratio [OR], 0.850; P = .006) was negatively associated with week 12 SFR, while biologic-naïve patients (OR, 2.078; P = .04) more likely achieved week 52 SFR. The colectomy rate at week 52 was higher in ASUC group (17.6% vs 5.7%; P < .001) and decreased with age (OR, 0.94; P = .013). A total of 67 adverse events were reported, and 17.9% resulted in cessation of TFB. One case of thromboembolic event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: TFB is effective in both studied indications. TFB treatment resulted in high rates of SFR in the short and long terms. Higher baseline disease activity and previous biological therapies decreased efficacy. No new adverse event signals were found.

Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness between Anti-TNF and Ustekinumab after Vedolizumab Failure as First-Line Therapy in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of anti-TNF or ustekinumab (UST) as a second-line biologic after vedolizumab (VDZ) failure has not yet been described. AIMS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, We aim to investigate the effectiveness of anti-TNF and UST as second-line therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who failed VDZ as a first-line treatment. The primary outcome was clinical response at week 16-22. Secondary outcomes included the rates of clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, CRP normalization, and adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients who failed on VDZ as a first-line treatment for CD were included; 52.8% patients received anti-TNF and 47.2% UST as a second-line therapy. In initial period (Week 16-22), the clinical response and remission rate was similar between both groups: 61.2% vs. 68%, p = 0.8 and 48.3% vs. 56%, p = 0.8 on anti-TNF and UST therapy, respectively. Furthermore, in the maintenance period the rate was similar: 75% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.8 and 62.5% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.8, respectively. Of the patients, 12 out of the 59 stopped the therapy, without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Second-line biological therapy after VDZ failure therapy was effective in >60% of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of anti-TNF and UST as a second line.

Biopsies from ulcer edge yield higher histological activity scores than biopsies from non-ulcerated mucosa in active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate location for biopsy collection in ulcerative colitis is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the location for biopsy collection in the presence of ulcers which yields the highest histopathological score. DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients with ulcerative colitis and ulcers in the colon. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the edge of the ulcer; at a distance of one open forceps (7-8 mm) from the ulcer edge; at a distance of three open forceps (21-24 mm) from the ulcer edge; further referred to as locations 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Histological activity was assessed using Robarts Histopathology Index and the Nancy Histological Index. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed effects models. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included. Decreasing trends with distance from the ulcer edge ( P  < 0.0001) were observed. Biopsies procured from the edge of the ulcer (location 1) yielded a higher histopathological score compared to biopsies procured at locations 2 and 3 ( P  ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biopsies from the ulcer edge yield higher histopathological scores than biopsies next to the ulcer. In clinical trials with histological endpoints, biopsies should be obtained from the ulcer edge (if ulcers are present) to reliably assess histological disease activity.

Comparison of 3 Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay Methods to Evaluate Serum Concentrations of Infliximab and Antibodies to Infliximab in 32 Patients with Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND Monitoring of trough levels and anti-drug antibodies is important when patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are treated with anti-TNF biologics due to guided therapeutic decisions. The comparability of 3 ELISA tests for detection of the lowest serum concentration of infliximab (IFX) or antibodies to IFX (ATIs) was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two commercial assays for measuring IFX levels were compared with the in-house (UHL) test. ATIs were measured with 1 commercial test and compared to the in-house test. According to the guidelines, IFX levels were within the range of 3 to 7 µg/mL. RESULTS The decision to continue therapy would be the same for 11 out of 16 patients when comparing the apDia Infliximab ELISA and UHL test, and for 12 out of 18 patients when comparing the Lisa-Tracker and in-house UHL test. Linear correlations between the tests were R=0.92 (UHL and apDia), R=0.91 (apDia and Lisa-Tracker), and R=0.89 (UHL and Lisa-Tracker) with P<0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS As the IFX levels are important for decisions on further therapy, detectable IFX levels realistically reflect the presence of the drug in the patients' blood and thus control inflammatory activity. The tests were found as comparable and performed well in this aspect and might be used in everyday clinical practice.

Non-hepatic Solid Organ Transplant in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Solid organ transplantation, with the exception of liver, has rarely been reported in patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. METHODS: This is an ECCO-CONFER project collecting cases of solid organ transplants [with the exclusion of liver] that were performed in IBD patients. We evaluated the change in the IBD therapy, need for bowel resection due to medically refractory IBD, or need for hospitalisation due to IBD relapse ['severe IBD course'] before and after transplantation. RESULTS: in total, 34 organ transplantations [28 kidney, five heart, one lung] in 33 IBD patients were collected [67% male, 55% Crohn's disease, mean age 53 ±â€…16 years]. The median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.2-10.7); 29 patients [87.9%] were treated with tacrolimus, 25 [76%] with systemic steroids, 22 [67%] with mycophenolate mofetil, 11 [33%] with everolimus, six with cyclosporine [18%]. One patient was treated with infliximab, two patients with adalimumab, two patients with vedolizumab, one patient with ustekinumab. Overall, a severe IBD course was observed in three [9.3%] patients before transplantation and in four [11.7%] in the post-transplant setting [p = 0.26]. Three cases of cancer [excluding skin non-melanoma] [9.1%] were recorded in the post-transplantation period versus two in the pre-transplantation period [6.1%, p = 0.04]. Six patients [18.2%] died during the period of observation. No deaths were associated with IBD or complications of the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In IBD patients, solid organ transplantation does not seem to impact on the IBD severity. However, the risk of malignancy needs further investigation.

Contemporary Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease after Ileocolonic Resection.

Surgery remains an important treatment modality in the multidisciplinary management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). To illustrate the recent advances in the management of postoperative CD we outline the contemporary approach to treatment: diagnosing disease recurrence using endoscopy or noninvasive methods and risk stratification underlying decisions to institute treatment. Endoscopic scoring indices are being refined to guide treatment decisions by accurately estimating the risk of recurrence based on endoscopic appearance. The original Rutgeerts score has been modified to separate anastomotic lesions from lesions in the neoterminal ileum. Two further indices, the REMIND score and the POCER index, were recently developed with the same intention. Noninvasive monitoring for recurrence using a method with high negative predictive value has the potential to simplify management algorithms and only perform ileocolonoscopy in a subset of patients. Fecal calprotectin, intestinal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance enterography are all being evaluated for this purpose. The use of infliximab for the prevention of postoperative recurrence is well supported by data, but management decisions are fraught with uncertainty for patients with previous exposure to biologics. Data on the use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab for postoperative CD are emerging, but controlled studies are lacking.

Abbreviated 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency performs equally as standard 5-hour test in patients after gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test (13C-MTGT) is a non-invasive test for the detection of moderate and severe pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), but it requires prolonged breath sampling. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic power of abbreviated 13C-MTGT in detecting PEI in patients after subtotal and total gastrectomy performed due to gastric cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included 3 groups of subjects; healthy controls, patients with subtotal and patients with total gastrectomy. Demographic and clinical data of patients were collected. Stool samples to determine faecal elastase (Fe-1) and chymotrypsin were collected and measured by ELISA. All subjects performed 5-hour 13C-MTGT breath test. The concentration and relative content of 13C in exhaled air was measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). PEI was confirmed as values of 13C-exhalation < 26.8% after 5 hours. RESULTS: Overall, 65 participants were included into analysis, 22 having PEI (n = 11 after subtotal and n = 11 after total gastrectomy, both performed for gastric cancer). 13C-MTGT breath test showed difference in percent of exhaled 13C between PEI and non-PEI patients already after 60 minutes (p = 0.034). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that cut-off value of 13.74% after 150 minutes is showing equivalent diagnostic power to the longer test with sensitivity and specificity both above 90% for the exclusion of PEI in patients after subtotal and/or total gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study abbreviated 13C-MTGT test could be shortened from 5 to 2.5 hours without decrease in its diagnostic accuracy for detection of PEI in patients with subtotal or total gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer. This allows significant time savings in the diagnostics of PEI in this subgroup of patients.

Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic-post-operative-recurrence [ePOR] in Crohn's disease [CD] after ileocecal resection [ICR] is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylaxis with biologics and to compare anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy to vedolizumab [VDZ] and ustekinumab [UST] in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study of CD-adults after curative ICR on early prophylaxis was undertaken. ePOR was defined as a Rutgeerts score [RS] ≥ i2 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD ≥ 6. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors, and inverse probability treatment weighting [IPTW] was applied to compare the effectiveness between agents. RESULTS: The study included 297 patients (53.9% males, age at diagnosis 24 years [19-32], age at ICR 34 years [26-43], 18.5% smokers, 27.6% biologic-naïve, 65.7% anti-TNF experienced, 28.6% two or more biologics and 17.2% previous surgery). Overall, 224, 39 and 34 patients received anti-TNF, VDZ or UST, respectively. Patients treated with VDZ and UST were more biologic experienced with higher rates of previous surgery. ePOR rates within 1 year were 41.8%. ePOR rates by treatment groups were: anti-TNF 40.2%, VDZ 33% and UST 61.8%. Risk factors for ePOR at 1 year were: past-infliximab (adjusted odds ratio [adj.OR] = 1.73 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-2.97]), past-adalimumab [adj.OR = 2.32 [95% CI: 1.35-4.01] and surgical aspects. After IPTW, the risk of ePOR within 1 year of VDZ vs anti-TNF or UST vs anti-TNF was comparable (OR = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.25-1.19], OR = 1.86 [95% CI: 0.79-4.38]), respectively. CONCLUSION: Prevention of ePOR within 1 year after surgery was successful in ~60% of patients. Patients treated with VDZ or UST consisted of a more refractory group. After controlling for confounders, no differences in ePOR risk were seen between anti-TNF prophylaxis and other groups.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease: unmet needs and future perspectives.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a useful tool for optimising the use of biologics, and in particular anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, challenges remain and are hindering the widespread implementation of TDM in clinical practice. These barriers include identification of the optimal drug concentration to target, the lag time between sampling and results, and the proper interpretation of anti-drug antibody titres among different assays. Solutions to overcome these barriers include the harmonisation of TDM assays and the use of point-of-care testing. Other unmet needs include well designed prospective studies and randomised controlled trials focusing on proactive TDM, particularly during induction therapy. Future studies should also investigate the utility of TDM for biologics other than anti-TNF therapies in both IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and the use of pharmacokinetic modelling dashboards and pharmacogenetics towards individual personalised medicine.

Intravenous versus subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics in IBD: an expert's and patient's perspective.

Several biologic treatments are available in addition to intravenous also in subcutaneous form for treatment of chronic diseases. Benefits of the subcutaneous application of drugs include self-administration by the patient, shorter time of application process with less infusion related adverse events and consequently lower healthcare costs. With appropriate education and support patients are able to administer their treatments at home. This leads to improvement of quality of life, reduction of time needed to travel to the healthcare institution and consequently also reduces costs also for the patient.Over one million residents in the USA and 2.5 million in Europe are estimated to have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with substantial costs for health care. These estimates do not factor in the 'real' price of IBD, which can impede career aspirations, instil social stigma and impair quality of life in patients.The Virtual Community Meeting, which offered an exchange of experience and opinions from healthcare professionals who are active in treating IBD, and patients with this chronic disease, revealed in-depth arguments and answers to some essential questions: which patients prefer subcutaneous over intravenous dosing; which patients continue to favour intravenous infusions; what are the limitations regarding both applications; what is the patient's role in therapeutical decision-making and how does IBD affect the patient's work, finances and quality of life? The aim of this article is to discuss the differences between subcutaneous and intravenous dosing from the health-economic, scientific, and personal perspectives.The meeting offered strong confirmation that most of the patients and healthcare professionals prefer subcutaneous over intravenous drug administration but emphasise the management of risks associated with treatment compliance. Patient education provided by the IBD team in this regard is mandatory. Quality of life of patients is poorer during active disease, but the findings that it can improve over time, including as a result of home- or self-administration of biologics, may be encouraging for individuals with this chronic disease.

Ustekinumab Dosing Individualization in Crohn's Disease Guided by a Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model.

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody used in Crohn's disease (CD). Dose optimization in case of non-response and the role of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) monitoring remain unresolved dilemmas in clinical practice. We aimed to develop a population PK-PD model for ustekinumab in CD and simulate efficacy of alternative dosing regimens. We included 57 patients and recorded their characteristics during 32 weeks after starting with ustekinumab therapy. Serum ustekinumab concentration was prospectively measured and fecal calprotectin (FC) concentration was used to monitor the disease activity. Ustekinumab PK-PD was described by a two-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model linked to an indirect response model. Lower fat-free mass, higher serum albumin, previous non-exposure to biologics, FCGR3A-158 V/V variant and lower C-reactive protein were associated with higher ustekinumab exposure. Model-based simulation suggested that 41.9% of patients receiving standard dosing achieve biochemical remission at week 32. In patients not achieving remission with standard dosing at week 16, transition to 4-weekly subcutaneous maintenance dosing with or without intravenous reinduction resulted in comparably higher remission rates at week 32 (51.1% vs. 49.2%, respectively). Our findings could be used to guide stratified ustekinumab treatment in CD, particularly in patients with unfavorable characteristics, who might benefit from early transition to 4-weekly maintenance dosing.

Ustekinumab concentrations shortly after escalation to monthly dosing may identify endoscopic remission in refractory Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with Crohn's disease do not achieve remission with the approved maintenance dosing of ustekinumab every 8 weeks, possibly due to insufficient drug exposure. We aimed to study the exposure-response relationship for endoscopic remission and biomarker normalization with ustekinumab dose escalation to every 4 weeks. METHODS: Out of 135 consecutive patients, 44 with active Crohn's disease despite standard maintenance dosing [at least one of C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L, fecal calprotectin >100 mg/kg, simple endoscopic score (SES) for Crohn's disease >3] underwent dose escalation to every 4 weeks. Subsequent endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤3 without ulceration) and biomarker normalization were compared against ustekinumab concentrations. RESULTS: Dose escalation led to endoscopic remission in 28.6% (8/28), CRP normalization 29.2% (7/24) and fecal calprotectin normalization 51.7% (15/29) of patients. Ustekinumab concentrations after escalation were higher in patients with endoscopic remission (6.90 vs. 4.29 mg/L; P = 0.025) and fecal calprotectin normalization (6.65 vs. 3.74 mg/L; P = 0.001). A threshold of 6.00 mg/L identified endoscopic remission [area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC): 0.775; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.551-0.999), a threshold of 4.40 mg/L (AUROC 0.755; 95% CI, 0.545-0.964) two months after escalation identified patients with fecal calprotectin normalization at the end of follow-up. Concentrations <3.5 mg/L after escalation precluded endoscopic remission or biomarker normalization. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic remission was associated with higher ustekinumab concentrations after dose escalation. Patients with concentrations <3.5 mg/L after dose escalation are unlikely to achieve endoscopic remission or biomarker normalization.

Effectiveness of Third-Class Biologic Treatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have described the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) failing anti- Tumor necrosis factors (TNFs); however, the effectiveness of VDZ or UST as a third-class biologic has not yet been described. AIMS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VDZ and UST as a third-class biologic in patients with CD. RESULTS: Two-hundred and four patients were included; 156/204 (76%) patients received VDZ as a second- and UST as a third-class therapy (group A); the remaining 48/204 (24%) patients received UST as a second- and VDZ as a third-class therapy (group B). At week 16-22, 87/156 (55.5%) patients and 27/48 (56.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, responded to treatment (p = 0.9); 41/156 (26.2%) and 15/48 (31.2%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). At week 52; 89/103 (86%) patients and 25/29 (86.2%) of the patients with available data had responded to third-class treatment in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.9); 31/103 (30%) and 47/29 (24.1%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Third-class biological therapy was effective in more than half of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of VDZ and UST as a third-class agent.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow of endoscopy units: an international survey.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. RESULTS: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.

The comparison of the three assays for determination of fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Fecal calprotectin is a biomarker for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. Our aim, therefore, was to evaluate two new assays, the point of care test Quantum Blue and the Liaison Calprotectin with respect to the Calprest, commonly used assay, and to determine their performance for IBD diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 73 prospective patients with IBD. Fecal calprotectin was measured and analysed with the routine Calprest assay and two recently introduced assays, the Quantum Blue and the Liaison Calprotectin. Furthermore, we compared the results by Bland and Altman analysis, and Passing-Bablok regression. RESULTS: We observed no difference in median calprotectin values obtained by the Calprest (94.6 µg/g, 95%CI 66.5 to 166.1) and Liaison assay (101.0 µg/g, 95%CI 48.1 to 180.1) whereas significantly higher concentrations were obtained with the Quantum Blue assay (240.0 µg/g, 95%CI 119.9 to 353.2). The mean absolute and relative difference between the Calprest and Quantum Blue methods was statistically significant (- 162.3 µg/g and- 143.1%). Mean absolute difference between the Calprest and Liaison calprotectin methods was positive (2.2 µg/g). The agreement between assays revealed that Quantum Blue and Calprest have fair agreement with Kappa coefficient of 0.38 (95%CI 0.26 to 0.51). Liaison Calprotectin and Calprest revealed moderate agreement with a weak Kappa coefficient of 0.47 (95%CI 0.32 to 0.62). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of these differences between the assays and avoid comparison of their respective results.

Dose optimisation for Loss of Response to Vedolizumab- Pharmacokinetics and Immune Mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Real life data regarding pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab in patients needing dose optimisation are scarce. We set to examine whether pre-optimisation vedolizumab levels associate with therapy outcomes and which mechanisms explain the associations. METHODS: A multicentre observational study assessed the outcome of dose increase in association with pre-escalation levels in vedolizumab-treated patients. SubsequentIy, α4ß7 occupancy on peripheral blood [PB] and intestinal lamina propria [LP] tissues was investigated on various cellular subsets in patients undergoing lower endoscopy on infusion day. Cellular localisation of vedolizumab-bound α4ß7 and effects on M1 and M2 macrophages were also explored. RESULTS: A total of 161 inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients were included. Among 129/161 patients intensified during maintenance [Week 14 onward], pre-intensification trough levels were comparable or higher among those subsequently attaining post-optimisation clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission, compared with non-remitting patients [p = 0.09, 0.25, 0.04, respectively]. Similar results were demonstrated for those dose-optimised during induction [Week 6, n = 32]. In the immune sub-study [n = 43], free α4ß7 receptors at trough were similarly low among patients with/without mucosal healing, on PB T cells [p = 0.15], LP T cells [p = 0.88], and on PB eosinophils [p = 0.08]. Integrin receptors on M1 and M2 macrophages were also saturated by low levels of vedolizumab and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion was not increased. Co-localisation and dissociation experiments demonstrated membranal α4ß7 receptors of two origins: non-internalised and newly generated α4ß7, but re-binding was still complete at very low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support pharmacokinetics as the mechanism responsible for loss of response to vedolizumab, nor do they support a need for higher drug concentration to enhance vedolizumab's immune effects. Higher pre-escalation levels may indicate less clearance [less severe disease] and higher likelihood of subsequent re-gained response, regardless of therapy escalation.